As part of Boba Quest 2025 🧋, I'm trying and reviewing a new boba shop each week whenever I have time.
It's been a while since my last boba review, but sometimes you visit a new place that just inspires you to write about it. ChaHalo recently opened in Long Island City, right in between the Queens Plaza station (E, F, R) and Court Square (7, E, F, G, R) so I thought I'd give it a try with my sister, who was in town for the holidays.
My sister wanted a drink without lactose, and since they didn't have an alternative milk, she asked for a jasmine green tea with boba. The barista added the jasmine green tea to the order and then said: "I'm sorry, our computer won't let you order boba with this." Whaaaaaaaaat. And then, "But we could give you some boba in a separate cup?"
What kind of boba shop offers a drink that you can't add boba to? And not even like some practical issue, it's that their computer can't handle it.
I was able to order a jasmine green milk tea with brown sugar boba without running afoul of any software restrictions. (There were no other boba options aside from brown sugar.)
Boba: 3/4 the brown sugar boba was actually pretty good, well flavored, maybe just a little overcooked.
Tea: 1/4 it was...not good. It was a bit bland to the point the taste of the boba totally overpowered it.
Bonus: 0/1 sorry, our experience didn't merit any bonus points.
Total: 4/10 honestly, if they served a brown sugar milk boba (with lactose-free options!!), I think it would be near perfect.
This story has a somewhat happy ending, in that we walked to a different tea shop across the street and my sister was able to get her lactose-free boba. Stay tuned for that review!
I just finished my first semester of law school Tuesday evening...only eight more to go! People say that the first year of law school is the worst, and I certainly hope that's true.
I don't think I've ever had so much information dumped into my brain in such a short period of time. In my Liberty, Equality and Due Process (LEDP) class about the Fourteenth Amendment, I took 109 pages of notes, and for Criminal Law, 54 pages.
As a very very condensed version of what I learned, here are the study guides I made for both classes:
I cannot yet vouch for the accuracy contained on those guides yet as I haven't gotten my grades back yet, but I think they're mostly correct!
Next semester is contracts, which'll probably be immediately practically useful, and legal research, which I'm really looking forward to. I now have access to Westlaw, which is both amazing in how rich the content and interface is...and terrible how it's all locked in a commercial, private database.
There have been a lot of Zohran Mamdani thinkpieces since November 4th, and I've read most of them! But I want to add three takeaways that I really haven't seen discussed elsewhere in detail.
In the past few weeks people have talked a lot about how Obama's volunteer army fell apart after he was elected and how Mamdani campaign leaders are trying to prevent that from happening by launching "Our Time", a separate entity that can organize former campaign volunteers and keep them politically activated.
But more immediately, I think it's worth understanding that there was a specific effort to prevent a repeat of Buffalo's 2021 mayoral election in which a socialist (India Walton) upset the incumbent mayor (Byron Brown) in the Democratic primary, so Brown launched an independent campaign for the general, rallied the Democratic establishment to support him and not Walton (the Democratic nominee), winning the general by 20 points.
With that context, it made perfect sense that immediately after the primary we saw Zohran moving to consolidate the establishment behind him, including labor and elected officials. It mostly worked, just about everyone backed him except Chuck Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand. Oh and Jay Jacobs, the chair of the state Democratic party, who refused to endorse Zohran just like he refused to endorse Walton, except at least this time he didn't compare the socialist upstart to David Duke!
But I have yet to see any reporting on how many volunteers came down from Buffalo to support the Zohran campaign in the final stretch. I met a decent amount of people who were very open about why they had come to the city: to prevent a repeat of what happened in 2021.
Because of the natural-born-citizen clause in the U.S. Constitution, Zohran is ineligible to run for U.S. president. Meanwhile it was incrediblyobvious that Andrew Cuomo was running for mayor to relaunch his political career so he could run for president in 2028. That would follow the recent trend of NYC mayors running for president, including Bill de Blasio (2020), Michael Bloomberg (also 2020) and Rudy Giuliani (2008).
And of course, way too many people touted Eric Adams as the "future of the Democratic party" and a future presidential candiate. Oops, should've listened to Andrew Yang.
I think it's underrated that Zohran can't run, and so after the primary win, there was no endless dicussion of whether he'd run in 2028 or some made up hypotheticals of him vs. AOC as to who should be the left's standard bearer, etc. And, it's much easier to convey and convince people that Zohran was genuinely interested in improving the lives of New Yorkers as the mayor and not just using it as a stepping stone to higher office.
In 2024, it very much felt that Indians were moving right, with Nikki Haley and Vivek Ramaswamy rising in the Republican ranks and Kamala Harris losing. Polling indicated Asians broadly shifted right (though I didn't find anything about Indians specifically). Not to mention the backdrop of Modi's right-wing government rising in India, which undoubtedly affects the views of the diaspora.
Anecdotally, the WhatsApp forwards were getting worse.
Zohran is easily the most high-profile Indian American politician in the U.S., but more importantly, his campaign was backed by incredibly strong South Asian turnout across the board, with Indian turnout rising from 18% to 45%. To quote: "South Asians and Muslims account for just 7 percent of the city’s registered voters, yet they cast an estimated 15 percent of all ballots in the general election." The aunties are activated.
People keep repeating how this mayoral election was like none other, and I geniunely have no idea what they mean. This was my first mayoral election as a New York City resident so it's also my baseline. I expect things to only go up from here, starting with the special election for my assemblymember and then the open primary for my U.S. House district.
Note: I had mostly finished this project last weekend, before Eric Adams dropped out of the mayoral race. While Adams will still be the mayor until January, this project made more sense while he was an active candidate.
WHERE'S ERIC? provides a compilation and visualization of when Eric Adams and other New York officials have failed to make their public schedule available in advance, as reported by Politico.
As the New York City mayor's race escalates, I've been paying closer attention to the local politics-focused media outlets, including reading Politico's "New York Playbook" regularly. Aside from the actual news, they have a brief section where they ask: "Where's Kathy?" and "Where's Eric?", and summarize what their public schedules for the day are.
That is, if they receive them. Lately Adams' entry has been some variant of "Schedule unavailable as of 10 p.m. [previous night]".
I was curious what this actually meant in the long-term; was I coincidentally just reading Playbook on days he didn't provide his schedule? Or has he always been bad about providing his public schedule? Are other politicans any better?
Of course, the best way to answer this question was to look at literally the entire history of New York Playbook, so I processed the entire archive dating back to 2016 to get a more complete picture. The first Playbook issue that contained then-Governor Andrew Cuomo and then-Mayor Bill de Blasio's schedules was February 21, 2017: de Blasio had events in Manhattan and The Bronx while Cuomo had no public schedule.
Moving forward to 2025, I was mildly surprised to learn that Adams was actually perfect in providing his public schedule for the first three years of his term. Then on Friday, March 21, his first ever "Schedule unavailable as of 10 p.m. Thursday." appeared.
In April, he didn't provide his public schedule more often than he did. Over the past 8 weeks, his schedule has been unavailable 65% of the time.
This is...not great.
Knowing what our public officials are up to is a standard form of transparency that enables the press to document their actions so the public can hold them accountable. Not being up front with what you're doing undermines public trust, and while this might feel like a small thing, I think it's a decent indicator for how public officials respect the public and the press in general.
Given how chaotic the last few months of the Adams administration have been, part of me is curious whether this is due to incompetence or malice. We know quite well that Adams acts maliciously when it comes to the city hall press corps.
And yet as bad as Adams is at this, he is still better than Andrew Cuomo, who, out of the four officials reported by Politico, is the worst.
WHERE'S ANDREW? shows how his record was consistently spotty since early 2017, but dramatically worsened in May 2020. Admittedly that was a pretty chaotic time for everyone, but this the same person who wanted us to celebrate his leadership during that time period.
During that same time periods Adams and Cuomo were failing at providing their public schedules, WHERE'S BILL? and WHERE'S KATHY? show in stark contrast that it was completely feasible to regularly provide their schedules.
Both provided their schedule to Politico 99% of the time, which I think shows that this is not a difficult task, and makes Adams' and Cuomo's failure to do so even more inadequate and unacceptable.
After scraping Politico's archive, the "Where's {name}?" fields were extracted into a database (raw data), with special handling for some edge cases. For example, on January 6, 2022, Politico had an joint item, "Where are Kathy and Eric?".
Also for about two weeks, Politico spelled it as "BlLL" (that's a lowercase L instead of an I). Oops.
A regular expression was used to identify days when the schedule was unavailable, specifically matching the phrases:
schedule unavailable
not available
schedule not available
schedule not released
unavailable as of
not released
by press time
schedule yet
no public schedule released as of
no public schedule available as of
as of {number}
Notably this does not match when a schedule was provided but there were no public events.
I performed a spot check against most of the unavailable dates and far fewer of the available ones, erring on the side of identifying false positives. If you do find an error, please contact me.
Major credit and thanks to the Politico reporters for collecting and reporting this data for nearly a decade.
I want to brag about a bit of YAML code I wrote back in March for SecureDrop's completed migration to Ubuntu Noble that I neglected to mention in the blog post explaining the technical details. Yes, YAML, is a programming language.
We offered SecureDrop Administrators the option for a "semiautomated" upgrade: they run one command, ./securedrop-admin noble_migration, and it'll take care of the rest. The main advantage for doing so was that the upgrade would happen at the time you chose, and if something happened to go wrong, you were already on hand to deal with it!
Under the hood the semiautomated upgrade was starting an Ansible playbook that edited our JSON control file to mark the server as ready to be upgraded and then started the systemd service. And then it just waits until the upgrade completes, which ended up being the harder part to implement.
During the upgrade, the server reboots twice (once before installing updates and once after), which means Ansible will lose its SSH connection. I used Ansible's wait_for_connection module to reconnect instead of error out, and naively had it wait for that to happen twice before checking if the upgrade had finished.
But during testing we found a problem when using SSH-over-Tor, in which Ansible would disconnect three times. It disconnected on the first pre-upgrade reboot, then during the upgrade when the Tor package was restarted, and then again during the second post-upgrade reboot.
And, to make it even more fun, this was subject to a race condition. In at least one instance, it took long enough for Tor to come back that the server rebooted before it reconnected, so there were only two disconnections.
Knowing that, a naive solution wasn't going to cut it anymore, so I implemented the same state machine as the Rust code, just in the YAML playbook. It now parsed the JSON state file, looked up where in the overall process it was, and then calculated how many reboots are likely remaining. Once it disconnected and reconnected, it looked at the state file again, so it knew how many more to expect.
Here's the end result, it ended up being just over 200 lines of YAML (including comments).
Alternative clickbait titles for this post include: "Porting some of my Rust code to YAML" and "Writing a state machine in YAML".
A small change in plans: I'm starting law school in the fall. I'll be attending the CUNY School of Law right here in Queens to become a public interest-focused lawyer.
